|
Philatelic
Journalism in War-Time
The outbreak of war has had little or no effect on the philatelic journals
published in neutral countries, and even in the case of those published
in the territories of the combatant powers a successful attempt has been
made to avoid an entire suspension of activity. Furthermore it should
be clearly understood that the observations we are about to make are applicable
only to the time (October) at which they are written, and that, when this
number of the Journal reaches our members, some at least of the suspended
papers will have reappeared.
As far as England is concerned, we believe that all the philatelic journals
have continued to appear, with the exception of Stanley Gibbons Monthly
Journal and the Monthly Report of the Herts Philatelic Society. To these
may be added Our Stamp Opinion, of which one number is said to have been
issued before the war; its publisher, writing on October 8th, informed
us that he “was expecting to go to the front.”
In France, all the philatelic journals known to us have ceased publication,
the following being the last numbers to reach us: Bulletin Philatélique
(No. 69, July 15th); Circulaire Philatélique (No. 122, April-May);
Collectionneur de Timbres-Poste (No. 406, August 1st); Echo de la Timbrologie
(No. 518, July 31st); Journal de Philatélistes (No. 42, July 15th);
Postillon (No. 482, July 10th); Revue Philatélique Française
(No. 269, July). Of the Bulletin Champion and Timbre-Poste, we have no
information, except that the latter is no longer being published.
Of Belgian periodicals, the last numbers received by us were the Annonce
Timbrologique of Brussels (No. 290, June 30th) and the Revue Postale of
Liége (No. 196, July-August).
As regards German papers, we are without information as to the Deutsche
Philatelist, Kohl’s Mitteilungen, Vertrauliches Korrespondentz-Blatt,
and the “advertisers” (Briefmarken-Offertenblatt and General-Anzeiger
für Philatelie). We learn, however, that Germania-Berichte (Nos.
7-8, 9), Philateliste-Zeitung (No. 8-9, August-September) and Philatelistische
Berichte (No. 69) are still appearing, and, through the kindness of friendly
correspondents, we are able to give some particulars of other publications.
The Deutsche Briefmarken-Zeitung, which may fairly be classed as the most
important German philatelic journal as regards its literary contents,
appeared (Vol. XXV, No. 9) on September 30th. This was the day of publication
announced in No. 8 (August 1st) and was fixed at a distance of two months
on account of the holiday season, in accordance with the practice of former
years. But on August 2nd, as the leading article, “World War,”
states, the German mobilization began, and some of the numbers posted
to addresses abroad were returned with the official note, “Wegen
Kriegzustanden zurück.”
In this article, after eulogizing the patriotic spirit shown by Germans
and Austrians, the writer, Mr. Hugo Krötzsch asks, “What other
power on earth could have not only called halt to an enemy so vastly superior
in numbers but also gained in so short a time entire confidence in ultimate
victory? ‘Deutschland, Deutschland über alles, über alles
in der Welt’ rules triumphant - and therein lies the secret of the
present world-war. Envy of the rise of German genius and industry in the
world-market has brought to a head the craving for German’s annihilation,
and, since this was found to be impossible of achievement in the honorable
rivalry of creative power and commerce, only the lighted torch of war
remained at the disposal of the annihilators. Of our enemies, England
for decades past has poured forth volleys of abuse against the growing
competition of German industry in the world-market and openly set legal
obstructions in the way of German trade. Our other adversaries have taken
the field against us from entirely different motives: France in the hope
of extending her frontier once more to the Rhine, and Russia in her steady
endeavor to enlarge her territory. In these two nations, eager for the
fight, England found willing coadjutors in hatred of Germany and helpers
in the English encircling policy. The Triple Entente was formed and Russia
undertook the job of setting the slow-match to the powder barrel. The
unscrupulous political murder committed by the Russian accomplice, the
Servian, in Serajavo, was the preliminary step on the part of the Triple
Entente, but nevertheless Austria, with her ally Germany, took up the
gauntlet flung down by England, who is the sole instigator of the war.
However distant Serajevo may be from the seat of the English war-maker
and however unctuously the English war-ring take pains to base their intervention
on the ground of the German entry [Einmarsch] into Belgium - this logical
explanation of the origin of the war is too plainly evident and the world’s
history will corroborate it.
“Of all our numerous enemies, only three deserve serious consideration
- France, Russia and England. The French, though our inferiors [nicht
ebenbürtige], are none the less worthy opponents; they, in the hope
of retaliation for the defeat of 1870, were too easily open to the English
blandishments, in spite of the fact that England is France’s hereditary
foe. Russia is not fighting against the liberation of that German industry
and genius which she cannot comprehend, but has lent her ear to the caressing
voice of England (though both powers stand at daggers drawn in Asia) in
the instinctive desire of an old-domiciled and double-branched group of
authorities, who are not in spiritual union with the people: (1) to increase
landed property and (2) to make the army-contractors happy. Even if the
one receives no fruits of victory, the other is provided for, since his
victory is complete before the war begins. The people, who sacrifice everything,
do not enter into the question in the least degree, as the knout has already,
in time of peace, made them ready to obey every request of the “Little
Father.” The Russian is the most powerful, dull-witted [stumpfsinnigste]
and - by reason of his Asiatic breed - our fiercest enemy in his invasion
of hostile territory.
“The Englishman, i.e., the English war-making group, is our basest
foe, but the weakest of the Triple Entente in the open field. Of Teutonic
race, this grisly-Grey group has united England with hostile Latins and
Muscovites on the assumption that with these as stalking-horses it can
annihilate Germandom and can do so moreover without any participation
in the war beyond the export of a handful of hired mercenaries. English
impotence is thus clearly evidenced and the conclusion of peace will show
what a sacrifice these war-makers have inflicted on every country save
their own. Our government and war-authorities have not only labored untiringly
during the long years of peace on warlike preparations of the highest
order in every respect, but have also certainly laid their plans for resisting
every possible enemy. The German people are fully confident that the General
Staff has also prepared for our dear cousins across the Channel a salve
(“made in Germany”) that will lessen the suffering and make
things easier for all parties concerned. This salve will also be daubed
on the Yellow Peril which has been conjured up in such an unspeakably
shameless way against the Germans.
“Exhilarating as was the Montenegrin declaration of war against
Germany, mightily effectual as was the opening of hostilities with Russia
and France, so with refreshing joy was the English declaration of war
received throughout Germany. But with England’s participation in
the struggle the opportunity presents itself of rending asunder the net
that enmeshes over the whole globe the strength of every non-English commercial
undertaking, and purifying the stiflingly close air overhanging the world-market,
so that every country may breathe freely again. With its active participation,
England has made a sacrifice of its hitherto invariable custom, intending,
when the time comes for peace negotiations, to fish the richest returns
out of the advantages gained by the efforts of others. The present war-footing
shows clearly that no single state can or must domineer over the world-market.
England has sapped Germany’s trade and the trade of the whole world
is at a standstill. As the distances between them are ever growing less,
no one Kultur-State can exist without the help of the rest.” After
expressing a wish that the world-war may be followed by “a really
long peace,” Mr. Krötzsch concludes with the hope that his
observations may enlighten his readers in neutral countries as to the
“insane calumnies against Germany.”
We refrain from the easy task of commenting on this illuminating outburst,
which may safely be left to the appreciation of our readers, and shall
confine ourselves to the observation that, on account of the decrease
in its advertisements, the publication of the next number of Deutsche
Briefmarken-Zeitung is announced to be postponed to November 12th. The
contents of the present number include a notice of the 1915 edition of
Senf’s Catalogue, which made its appearance on September 10th, and
is expected to remain current until the summer of 1916 (We learn that
for the first time a limited number of copies of this edition was printed
on writing paper, on one side of the leaf only); no new edition of the
“entires” section will appear for the present. From the news
of Societies’ proceedings, we learn that Staff-Doctor Pirl, a member
of the Philatelic Literature Society, was serving with his regiment in
the West. Of these societies, the Briefmarkensammler-Verein Nürnberg
held a meeting on August 13th.
The proceedings were short, lasting only from 9:15 to 9:22 p.m., and consisted
of a presidential address in which the speaker, after a few patriotic
words, proposed that the funds of the society, amounting to 50 pounds
(invested in the 3 percent Nuremberg Tramway Loan of 1903) should be given
to the relief-agencies of Nuremberg and Fürth. The suggestion was
unanimously accepted with the cry of “Unser geliebter Landesvater,
Seine Majestät König Ludwig von Bayern: Hurrah! Unser oberster
Kriegsherr, Seine Majestät der Deutsche Kaiser: Hurrah! Unsere Armee
und Flotte: Hurrah! Unser geliebtes deutsches Vaterland: Hurrah!”
The Philatelist appeared (Vol. XXXV, No. 9) on September 15th. Its first
page is occupied by the Emperor’s proclamation (“An das deutsche
Volk”) of August 6th, and this is followed by a very brief editorial
notice couched in restrained language - “Germany is menaced by foes.
The sword will pronounce judgment. It is not for the Internationaler Philatelisten-Verein
[i.e., the Dresden Philatelic Society, which publishes this journal] to
deal with politics. We shall only say to our worthy members that the Society’s
meetings were resumed at the beginning of September…. The Society
has made it its most urgent business to transmit the sum of M. 1,000 to
the National Red Cross Society.” The Philatelist’s restraint
is, however, less apparent in its following number (No. 10, October 15th),
where much space is devoted to “spreading the light abroad”
for the benefit of its readers in neutral countries, who are invited to
consider the shameless horrors committed by the enemies of Germany.
The Illustriertes Briefmarken-Journal issued a number (Vol. XLI, No. 16)
in August. We have not seen this, but the following issues, of September
19th and October 17th, are double numbers (17-18, 19-20), containing,
however, only 24 pages. Its article and notes are confined to purely philatelic
topics. As for the Berliner Briefmarken-Zeitung, published on September
30th (Vol. X, No. 15-16), its leading article, “Postage Stamps and
the War,” after remarking that “no one at present can say
what the end of the war and its results will be, either for the victor
or the vanquished,” passes on to consider the present and future
state of philately from the commercial point of view. The reflections
of the Berlin writer are of a conventional character and might have been
echoed from those of his English or American confreres, but it is of interest
to note his statement to the effect that some of even the larger stamp
businesses in Germany were hard hit, “a few so severely that they
threw up the sponge and stopped working. Some even did not hesitate to
devise sundry expedients for getting rid of burdensome contracts with
employees, their point of view being that a situation falls through in
time of war.” With regard to German stamp-collectors themselves,
we learn that “a large number are endeavoring to complete their
collections of Belgium, Serbia and Montenegro, presumably in the belief
that these States will soon be `closed down’ territories. There
is a lively demand, too, we are told, for German Colonial stamps, the
Berlin office where they are sold being “overwhelmed with personal
and written orders.” The article concludes by referring to proposals
made, in certain German philatelic societies, for the exclusion of members
of enemy countries. Such a step, it says, would be most deplorable, inasmuch
as, when peace is restored, philately will be one of the many bridges
reuniting the sundered relations of the civilized world.
|
|
 |